×

0
0

Men's rights aren't undone by women, but policymakersGeneral (self.MensRights)

submitted by throwaway0408800

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Vegetable_Ad1732 43 points44 points  (7 children)

It's both. The reason the policy makers do this is because of the size of the female voting block, and because, unlike men, women vote their interests.

[–]House-of-Raven 21 points22 points  (2 children)

Who has men’s interest though? Personally, none of the parties I can vote for have any intention of improving men’s rights.

[–]Vegetable_Ad1732 10 points11 points  (0 children)

True, so you have to vote for the least toxic one. Don't let perfect be the enemy of the good.

[–]reverbiscrap 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Start at the state level, not the national one. Reach out to your city representatives first, then state capital.

Your scenario is no different than Kamala Harris using black people to thrust her campaign along, while also being on record as stating she will not address black community concerns in particular unless it 'helps everybody'. I also noticed that Facebook and Instagram is autoblocking websites that list black community political agendas and how current politicos could address them.

[–]throwaway0408800[S] 7 points8 points  (3 children)

You vote for policymakers, not policies. Judges are widely appointed. And both parties have eroded rights of men (not to mention human rights) in various ways.

[–]Vegetable_Ad1732 6 points7 points  (2 children)

True, but one party has eroded them more than the other. You have to vote for the "least worst", if I may be allowed to mangle the English language a little.

[–]throwaway0408800[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

And that "least worst" party is happy to see the other one wreak havoc on them, because it gives them more political collateral. Same as the Roe vs. Wade repeal. Which party do you think was actually happiest about it?

[–]Vegetable_Ad1732 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Once again, I have to agree with you.